<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Animal-Communication on This Might Be Something!</title><link>https://notes.danavery.com/tags/animal-communication/</link><description>Recent content in Animal-Communication on This Might Be Something!</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 11:12:50 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://notes.danavery.com/tags/animal-communication/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Trees and Language</title><link>https://notes.danavery.com/posts/2024-09-30-tree-language/</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 11:12:50 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://notes.danavery.com/posts/2024-09-30-tree-language/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;From 2017: &lt;a href="https://qz.com/1116991/a-biologist-believes-that-trees-speak-a-language-we-can-learn"&gt;A biologist believes that trees speak a language we can learn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I haven&amp;rsquo;t followed up yet on the book being written about here, but I do have the general sense that we&amp;rsquo;re going to be surprised how many living things this will end up being true of.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a large part of why machine learning is interesting to me. If it&amp;rsquo;s about nothing else, machine learning is all about pattern recognition&amp;ndash;finding patterns that are too complex for us to find on our own, or in a latent space that we aren&amp;rsquo;t really able to comprehend. Like non-human communication.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>